diff options
author | Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> | 2009-01-06 14:39:36 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-01-06 15:59:03 -0800 |
commit | a2c43eed8334e878702fca713b212ae2a11d84b9 (patch) | |
tree | 4eb3f9b9153df5e7a638b15a6f7c9aa924066a94 /mm/swapfile.c | |
parent | 7b1fe59793e61f826bef053107b57b23954833bb (diff) | |
download | linux-3.10-a2c43eed8334e878702fca713b212ae2a11d84b9.tar.gz linux-3.10-a2c43eed8334e878702fca713b212ae2a11d84b9.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-a2c43eed8334e878702fca713b212ae2a11d84b9.zip |
mm: try_to_free_swap replaces remove_exclusive_swap_page
remove_exclusive_swap_page(): its problem is in living up to its name.
It doesn't matter if someone else has a reference to the page (raised
page_count); it doesn't matter if the page is mapped into userspace
(raised page_mapcount - though that hints it may be worth keeping the
swap): all that matters is that there be no more references to the swap
(and no writeback in progress).
swapoff (try_to_unuse) has been removing pages from swapcache for years,
with no concern for page count or page mapcount, and we used to have a
comment in lookup_swap_cache() recognizing that: if you go for a page of
swapcache, you'll get the right page, but it could have been removed from
swapcache by the time you get page lock.
So, give up asking for exclusivity: get rid of
remove_exclusive_swap_page(), and remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref() and
remove_exclusive_swap_page_count() which were spawned for the recent LRU
work: replace them by the simpler try_to_free_swap() which just checks
page_swapcount().
Similarly, remove the page_count limitation from free_swap_and_count(),
but assume that it's worth holding on to the swap if page is mapped and
swap nowhere near full. Add a vm_swap_full() test in free_swap_cache()?
It would be consistent, but I think we probably have enough for now.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/swapfile.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/swapfile.c | 70 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 58 deletions
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c index bfd4ee59cb8..f4360182760 100644 --- a/mm/swapfile.c +++ b/mm/swapfile.c @@ -348,68 +348,23 @@ int reuse_swap_page(struct page *page) } /* - * Work out if there are any other processes sharing this - * swap cache page. Free it if you can. Return success. + * If swap is getting full, or if there are no more mappings of this page, + * then try_to_free_swap is called to free its swap space. */ -static int remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(struct page *page, int count) +int try_to_free_swap(struct page *page) { - int retval; - struct swap_info_struct * p; - swp_entry_t entry; - VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page)); if (!PageSwapCache(page)) return 0; if (PageWriteback(page)) return 0; - if (page_count(page) != count) /* us + cache + ptes */ - return 0; - - entry.val = page_private(page); - p = swap_info_get(entry); - if (!p) + if (page_swapcount(page)) return 0; - /* Is the only swap cache user the cache itself? */ - retval = 0; - if (p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)] == 1) { - /* Recheck the page count with the swapcache lock held.. */ - spin_lock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock); - if ((page_count(page) == count) && !PageWriteback(page)) { - __delete_from_swap_cache(page); - SetPageDirty(page); - retval = 1; - } - spin_unlock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock); - } - spin_unlock(&swap_lock); - - if (retval) { - swap_free(entry); - page_cache_release(page); - } - - return retval; -} - -/* - * Most of the time the page should have two references: one for the - * process and one for the swap cache. - */ -int remove_exclusive_swap_page(struct page *page) -{ - return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2); -} - -/* - * The pageout code holds an extra reference to the page. That raises - * the reference count to test for to 2 for a page that is only in the - * swap cache plus 1 for each process that maps the page. - */ -int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *page) -{ - return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2 + page_mapcount(page)); + delete_from_swap_cache(page); + SetPageDirty(page); + return 1; } /* @@ -436,13 +391,12 @@ void free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry) spin_unlock(&swap_lock); } if (page) { - int one_user; - - one_user = (page_count(page) == 2); - /* Only cache user (+us), or swap space full? Free it! */ - /* Also recheck PageSwapCache after page is locked (above) */ + /* + * Not mapped elsewhere, or swap space full? Free it! + * Also recheck PageSwapCache now page is locked (above). + */ if (PageSwapCache(page) && !PageWriteback(page) && - (one_user || vm_swap_full())) { + (!page_mapped(page) || vm_swap_full())) { delete_from_swap_cache(page); SetPageDirty(page); } |