memcg: swappiness

Currently, /proc/sys/vm/swappiness can change swappiness ratio for global
reclaim.  However, memcg reclaim doesn't have tuning parameter for itself.

In general, the optimal swappiness depend on workload.  (e.g.  hpc
workload need to low swappiness than the others.)

Then, per cgroup swappiness improve administrator tunability.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 71 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 027c0dd7a83..ab2ecbb95b8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	int		obsolete;
 	atomic_t	refcnt;
 
+	unsigned int	swappiness;
+
+
 	unsigned int inactive_ratio;
 
 	/*
@@ -636,6 +639,22 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static unsigned int get_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+	struct cgroup *cgrp = memcg->css.cgroup;
+	unsigned int swappiness;
+
+	/* root ? */
+	if (cgrp->parent == NULL)
+		return vm_swappiness;
+
+	spin_lock(&memcg->reclaim_param_lock);
+	swappiness = memcg->swappiness;
+	spin_unlock(&memcg->reclaim_param_lock);
+
+	return swappiness;
+}
+
 /*
  * Dance down the hierarchy if needed to reclaim memory. We remember the
  * last child we reclaimed from, so that we don't end up penalizing
@@ -656,7 +675,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
 	 * but there might be left over accounting, even after children
 	 * have left.
 	 */
-	ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(root_mem, gfp_mask, noswap);
+	ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(root_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
+					   get_swappiness(root_mem));
 	if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
 		return 0;
 	if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy)
@@ -672,7 +692,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
 			cgroup_unlock();
 			continue;
 		}
-		ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(next_mem, gfp_mask, noswap);
+		ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(next_mem, gfp_mask, noswap,
+						   get_swappiness(next_mem));
 		if (mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(root_mem))
 			return 0;
 		cgroup_lock();
@@ -1400,7 +1421,8 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	do {
-		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask, true);
+		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask, true,
+							get_swappiness(mem));
 		progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
 	} while (!progress && --retry);
 
@@ -1468,7 +1490,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			break;
 
 		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg,
-				GFP_KERNEL, false);
+							GFP_KERNEL,
+							false,
+							get_swappiness(memcg));
   		if (!progress)			retry_count--;
 	}
 
@@ -1512,7 +1536,8 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			break;
 
 		oldusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
-		try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true);
+		try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true,
+					     get_swappiness(memcg));
 		curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
 		if (curusage >= oldusage)
 			retry_count--;
@@ -1643,8 +1668,8 @@ try_to_free:
 			ret = -EINTR;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem,
-						  GFP_KERNEL, false);
+		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, GFP_KERNEL,
+						false, get_swappiness(mem));
 		if (!progress) {
 			nr_retries--;
 			/* maybe some writeback is necessary */
@@ -1864,6 +1889,37 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static u64 mem_cgroup_swappiness_read(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+
+	return get_swappiness(memcg);
+}
+
+static int mem_cgroup_swappiness_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
+				       u64 val)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+	struct mem_cgroup *parent;
+	if (val > 100)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (cgrp->parent == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp->parent);
+	/* If under hierarchy, only empty-root can set this value */
+	if ((parent->use_hierarchy) ||
+	    (memcg->use_hierarchy && !list_empty(&cgrp->children)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	spin_lock(&memcg->reclaim_param_lock);
+	memcg->swappiness = val;
+	spin_unlock(&memcg->reclaim_param_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 
 static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
 	{
@@ -1902,6 +1958,11 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
 		.write_u64 = mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write,
 		.read_u64 = mem_cgroup_hierarchy_read,
 	},
+	{
+		.name = "swappiness",
+		.read_u64 = mem_cgroup_swappiness_read,
+		.write_u64 = mem_cgroup_swappiness_write,
+	},
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
@@ -2093,6 +2154,9 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
 	mem->last_scanned_child = NULL;
 	spin_lock_init(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
 
+	if (parent)
+		mem->swappiness = get_swappiness(parent);
+
 	return &mem->css;
 free_out:
 	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)