diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-11 09:19:47 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-11 09:19:47 -0800 |
commit | 0c0d61ca93d111c521182c0909e478fa709e05c6 (patch) | |
tree | be690362142ec79a673f85d7b2b7323102fab6f8 /fs | |
parent | eedcdefb1ad75de9cc0889b247524be64cc244ef (diff) | |
parent | bb50c8012cbd85b8e105584b32e4d5a2d335dcef (diff) | |
download | linux-3.10-0c0d61ca93d111c521182c0909e478fa709e05c6.tar.gz linux-3.10-0c0d61ca93d111c521182c0909e478fa709e05c6.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-0c0d61ca93d111c521182c0909e478fa709e05c6.zip |
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux
* 'for-linus' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
SUNPRC: Fix printk format warning
nfsd: clean up svc_reserve_auth()
NLM: don't requeue block if it was invalidated while GRANT_MSG was in flight
NLM: don't reattempt GRANT_MSG when there is already an RPC in flight
NLM: have server-side RPC clients default to soft RPC tasks
NLM: set RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NOPING for NLM RPC clients
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/host.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/svclock.c | 28 |
2 files changed, 33 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/lockd/host.c b/fs/lockd/host.c index ca6b16fc310..f1ef49fff11 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/host.c +++ b/fs/lockd/host.c @@ -243,10 +243,18 @@ nlm_bind_host(struct nlm_host *host) .program = &nlm_program, .version = host->h_version, .authflavor = RPC_AUTH_UNIX, - .flags = (RPC_CLNT_CREATE_HARDRTRY | + .flags = (RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NOPING | RPC_CLNT_CREATE_AUTOBIND), }; + /* + * lockd retries server side blocks automatically so we want + * those to be soft RPC calls. Client side calls need to be + * hard RPC tasks. + */ + if (!host->h_server) + args.flags |= RPC_CLNT_CREATE_HARDRTRY; + clnt = rpc_create(&args); if (!IS_ERR(clnt)) host->h_rpcclnt = clnt; diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 2f4d8fa6668..fe9bdb4a220 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -763,11 +763,20 @@ callback: dprintk("lockd: GRANTing blocked lock.\n"); block->b_granted = 1; - /* Schedule next grant callback in 30 seconds */ - nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 30 * HZ); + /* keep block on the list, but don't reattempt until the RPC + * completes or the submission fails + */ + nlmsvc_insert_block(block, NLM_NEVER); + + /* Call the client -- use a soft RPC task since nlmsvc_retry_blocked + * will queue up a new one if this one times out + */ + error = nlm_async_call(block->b_call, NLMPROC_GRANTED_MSG, + &nlmsvc_grant_ops); - /* Call the client */ - nlm_async_call(block->b_call, NLMPROC_GRANTED_MSG, &nlmsvc_grant_ops); + /* RPC submission failed, wait a bit and retry */ + if (error < 0) + nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ); } /* @@ -786,6 +795,17 @@ static void nlmsvc_grant_callback(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) dprintk("lockd: GRANT_MSG RPC callback\n"); + /* if the block is not on a list at this point then it has + * been invalidated. Don't try to requeue it. + * + * FIXME: it's possible that the block is removed from the list + * after this check but before the nlmsvc_insert_block. In that + * case it will be added back. Perhaps we need better locking + * for nlm_blocked? + */ + if (list_empty(&block->b_list)) + return; + /* Technically, we should down the file semaphore here. Since we * move the block towards the head of the queue only, no harm * can be done, though. */ |