diff options
author | Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> | 2008-02-07 16:34:55 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> | 2008-04-23 16:13:36 -0400 |
commit | d751a7cd0695554498f25d3026ca6710dbb3698f (patch) | |
tree | 31ec617dfb9fb70160bb8d2d9c9fd2e5c1e50c15 /fs/lockd/svc.c | |
parent | 7086721f9c8b59331e164e534f588e075cfd9d3f (diff) | |
download | linux-3.10-d751a7cd0695554498f25d3026ca6710dbb3698f.tar.gz linux-3.10-d751a7cd0695554498f25d3026ca6710dbb3698f.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-d751a7cd0695554498f25d3026ca6710dbb3698f.zip |
NLM: Convert lockd to use kthreads
Have lockd_up start lockd using kthread_run. With this change,
lockd_down now blocks until lockd actually exits, so there's no longer
need for the waitqueue code at the end of lockd_down. This also means
that only one lockd can be running at a time which simplifies the code
within lockd's main loop.
This also adds a check for kthread_should_stop in the main loop of
nlmsvc_retry_blocked and after that function returns. There's no sense
continuing to retry blocks if lockd is coming down anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/lockd/svc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/svc.c | 132 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc.c b/fs/lockd/svc.c index 1ed8bd4de94..66b5c98c7ff 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svc.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svc.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/smp_lock.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> #include <linux/freezer.h> #include <linux/sunrpc/types.h> @@ -48,14 +49,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nlmsvc_ops); static DEFINE_MUTEX(nlmsvc_mutex); static unsigned int nlmsvc_users; -static pid_t nlmsvc_pid; +static struct task_struct *nlmsvc_task; static struct svc_serv *nlmsvc_serv; int nlmsvc_grace_period; unsigned long nlmsvc_timeout; -static DECLARE_COMPLETION(lockd_start_done); -static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(lockd_exit); - /* * These can be set at insmod time (useful for NFS as root filesystem), * and also changed through the sysctl interface. -- Jamie Lokier, Aug 2003 @@ -111,35 +109,30 @@ static inline void clear_grace_period(void) /* * This is the lockd kernel thread */ -static void -lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) +static int +lockd(void *vrqstp) { int err = 0; + struct svc_rqst *rqstp = vrqstp; unsigned long grace_period_expire; - /* Lock module and set up kernel thread */ - /* lockd_up is waiting for us to startup, so will - * be holding a reference to this module, so it - * is safe to just claim another reference - */ - __module_get(THIS_MODULE); - lock_kernel(); - - /* - * Let our maker know we're running. - */ - nlmsvc_pid = current->pid; - nlmsvc_serv = rqstp->rq_server; - complete(&lockd_start_done); - - daemonize("lockd"); + /* try_to_freeze() is called from svc_recv() */ set_freezable(); - /* Process request with signals blocked, but allow SIGKILL. */ + /* Allow SIGKILL to tell lockd to drop all of its locks */ allow_signal(SIGKILL); dprintk("NFS locking service started (ver " LOCKD_VERSION ").\n"); + /* + * FIXME: it would be nice if lockd didn't spend its entire life + * running under the BKL. At the very least, it would be good to + * have someone clarify what it's intended to protect here. I've + * seen some handwavy posts about posix locking needing to be + * done under the BKL, but it's far from clear. + */ + lock_kernel(); + if (!nlm_timeout) nlm_timeout = LOCKD_DFLT_TIMEO; nlmsvc_timeout = nlm_timeout * HZ; @@ -148,10 +141,9 @@ lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) /* * The main request loop. We don't terminate until the last - * NFS mount or NFS daemon has gone away, and we've been sent a - * signal, or else another process has taken over our job. + * NFS mount or NFS daemon has gone away. */ - while ((nlmsvc_users || !signalled()) && nlmsvc_pid == current->pid) { + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { long timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT; RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]); @@ -161,6 +153,7 @@ lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) nlmsvc_invalidate_all(); grace_period_expire = set_grace_period(); } + continue; } /* @@ -195,28 +188,19 @@ lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) } flush_signals(current); + if (nlmsvc_ops) + nlmsvc_invalidate_all(); + nlm_shutdown_hosts(); - /* - * Check whether there's a new lockd process before - * shutting down the hosts and clearing the slot. - */ - if (!nlmsvc_pid || current->pid == nlmsvc_pid) { - if (nlmsvc_ops) - nlmsvc_invalidate_all(); - nlm_shutdown_hosts(); - nlmsvc_pid = 0; - nlmsvc_serv = NULL; - } else - printk(KERN_DEBUG - "lockd: new process, skipping host shutdown\n"); - wake_up(&lockd_exit); + unlock_kernel(); + + nlmsvc_task = NULL; + nlmsvc_serv = NULL; /* Exit the RPC thread */ svc_exit_thread(rqstp); - /* Release module */ - unlock_kernel(); - module_put_and_exit(0); + return 0; } /* @@ -261,14 +245,15 @@ static int make_socks(struct svc_serv *serv, int proto) int lockd_up(int proto) /* Maybe add a 'family' option when IPv6 is supported ?? */ { - struct svc_serv * serv; - int error = 0; + struct svc_serv *serv; + struct svc_rqst *rqstp; + int error = 0; mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex); /* * Check whether we're already up and running. */ - if (nlmsvc_pid) { + if (nlmsvc_serv) { if (proto) error = make_socks(nlmsvc_serv, proto); goto out; @@ -295,13 +280,28 @@ lockd_up(int proto) /* Maybe add a 'family' option when IPv6 is supported ?? */ /* * Create the kernel thread and wait for it to start. */ - error = svc_create_thread(lockd, serv); - if (error) { + rqstp = svc_prepare_thread(serv, &serv->sv_pools[0]); + if (IS_ERR(rqstp)) { + error = PTR_ERR(rqstp); printk(KERN_WARNING - "lockd_up: create thread failed, error=%d\n", error); + "lockd_up: svc_rqst allocation failed, error=%d\n", + error); + goto destroy_and_out; + } + + svc_sock_update_bufs(serv); + nlmsvc_serv = rqstp->rq_server; + + nlmsvc_task = kthread_run(lockd, rqstp, serv->sv_name); + if (IS_ERR(nlmsvc_task)) { + error = PTR_ERR(nlmsvc_task); + nlmsvc_task = NULL; + nlmsvc_serv = NULL; + printk(KERN_WARNING + "lockd_up: kthread_run failed, error=%d\n", error); + svc_exit_thread(rqstp); goto destroy_and_out; } - wait_for_completion(&lockd_start_done); /* * Note: svc_serv structures have an initial use count of 1, @@ -323,37 +323,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockd_up); void lockd_down(void) { - static int warned; - mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex); if (nlmsvc_users) { if (--nlmsvc_users) goto out; - } else - printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd_down: no users! pid=%d\n", nlmsvc_pid); - - if (!nlmsvc_pid) { - if (warned++ == 0) - printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd_down: no lockd running.\n"); - goto out; + } else { + printk(KERN_ERR "lockd_down: no users! task=%p\n", + nlmsvc_task); + BUG(); } - warned = 0; - kill_proc(nlmsvc_pid, SIGKILL, 1); - /* - * Wait for the lockd process to exit, but since we're holding - * the lockd semaphore, we can't wait around forever ... - */ - clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING); - interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&lockd_exit, HZ); - if (nlmsvc_pid) { - printk(KERN_WARNING - "lockd_down: lockd failed to exit, clearing pid\n"); - nlmsvc_pid = 0; + if (!nlmsvc_task) { + printk(KERN_ERR "lockd_down: no lockd running.\n"); + BUG(); } - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - recalc_sigpending(); - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + kthread_stop(nlmsvc_task); out: mutex_unlock(&nlmsvc_mutex); } |