[DLM] Fix potential conflict in DLM userland locks

Just spotted this one. The lockinfo structs are hashed by lockid but into a
global structure. So that if there are two lockspaces with the same lockid all
hell breaks loose. I'm not exactly sure what will happen but it can't be good!

The attached patch moves the lockinfo_idr into the user_ls structure so that
lockids are localised.

patrick

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 29 deletions

diff --git a/fs/dlm/device.c b/fs/dlm/device.c
index 47798fe46d7..825bbc0a09c 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/device.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/device.c
@@ -45,10 +45,6 @@ static const char *name_prefix="dlm";
 static struct list_head user_ls_list;
 static struct mutex user_ls_lock;
 
-/* Lock infos are stored in here indexed by lock ID */
-static DEFINE_IDR(lockinfo_idr);
-static rwlock_t lockinfo_lock;
-
 /* Flags in li_flags */
 #define LI_FLAG_COMPLETE   1
 #define LI_FLAG_FIRSTLOCK  2
@@ -99,6 +95,10 @@ struct user_ls {
 	atomic_t ls_refcnt;
 	long     ls_flags;
 
+	/* Lock infos are stored in here indexed by lock ID */
+	struct idr lockinfo_idr;
+	rwlock_t lockinfo_lock;
+
 	/* Passed into misc_register() */
 	struct miscdevice ls_miscinfo;
 	struct list_head  ls_list;
@@ -240,13 +240,13 @@ static void put_file_info(struct file_info *f)
 		kfree(f);
 }
 
-static void release_lockinfo(struct lock_info *li)
+static void release_lockinfo(struct user_ls *ls, struct lock_info *li)
 {
 	put_file_info(li->li_file);
 
-	write_lock(&lockinfo_lock);
-	idr_remove(&lockinfo_idr, li->li_lksb.sb_lkid);
-	write_unlock(&lockinfo_lock);
+	write_lock(&ls->lockinfo_lock);
+	idr_remove(&ls->lockinfo_idr, li->li_lksb.sb_lkid);
+	write_unlock(&ls->lockinfo_lock);
 
 	if (li->li_lksb.sb_lvbptr)
 		kfree(li->li_lksb.sb_lvbptr);
@@ -255,46 +255,46 @@ static void release_lockinfo(struct lock_info *li)
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
 }
 
-static struct lock_info *get_lockinfo(uint32_t lockid)
+static struct lock_info *get_lockinfo(struct user_ls *ls, uint32_t lockid)
 {
 	struct lock_info *li;
 
-	read_lock(&lockinfo_lock);
-	li = idr_find(&lockinfo_idr, lockid);
-	read_unlock(&lockinfo_lock);
+	read_lock(&ls->lockinfo_lock);
+	li = idr_find(&ls->lockinfo_idr, lockid);
+	read_unlock(&ls->lockinfo_lock);
 
 	return li;
 }
 
-static int add_lockinfo(struct lock_info *li)
+static int add_lockinfo(struct user_ls *ls, struct lock_info *li)
 {
 	int n;
 	int r;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
-	write_lock(&lockinfo_lock);
+	write_lock(&ls->lockinfo_lock);
 
-	if (idr_find(&lockinfo_idr, li->li_lksb.sb_lkid))
+	if (idr_find(&ls->lockinfo_idr, li->li_lksb.sb_lkid))
 		goto out_up;
 
 	ret = -ENOMEM;
-	r = idr_pre_get(&lockinfo_idr, GFP_KERNEL);
+	r = idr_pre_get(&ls->lockinfo_idr, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!r)
 		goto out_up;
 
-	r = idr_get_new_above(&lockinfo_idr, li, li->li_lksb.sb_lkid, &n);
+	r = idr_get_new_above(&ls->lockinfo_idr, li, li->li_lksb.sb_lkid, &n);
 	if (r)
 		goto out_up;
 
 	if (n != li->li_lksb.sb_lkid) {
-		idr_remove(&lockinfo_idr, n);
+		idr_remove(&ls->lockinfo_idr, n);
 		goto out_up;
 	}
 
 	ret = 0;
 
  out_up:
-	write_unlock(&lockinfo_lock);
+	write_unlock(&ls->lockinfo_lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ static int register_lockspace(char *name, struct user_ls **ls, int flags)
 		return status;
 	}
 
+	idr_init(&newls->lockinfo_idr);
+	rwlock_init(&newls->lockinfo_lock);
+
 	snprintf((char*)newls->ls_miscinfo.name, namelen, "%s_%s",
 		 name_prefix, name);
 
@@ -486,13 +489,13 @@ static void ast_routine(void *param)
 			list_del(&li->li_ownerqueue);
 			clear_bit(LI_FLAG_ONLIST, &li->li_flags);
 			spin_unlock(&li->li_file->fi_li_lock);
-			release_lockinfo(li);
+			release_lockinfo(li->li_file->fi_ls, li);
 			return;
 		}
 		/* Free unlocks & queries */
 		if (li->li_lksb.sb_status == -DLM_EUNLOCK ||
 		    li->li_cmd == DLM_USER_QUERY) {
-			release_lockinfo(li);
+			release_lockinfo(li->li_file->fi_ls, li);
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* Synchronous request, just wake up the caller */
@@ -641,7 +644,7 @@ static int dlm_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 				       old_li->li_lksb.sb_lkid, status);
 
 			/* But tidy our references in it */
-			release_lockinfo(old_li);
+			release_lockinfo(old_li->li_file->fi_ls, old_li);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -662,7 +665,7 @@ static int dlm_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 
 		/* Unlock suceeded, free the lock_info struct. */
 		if (status == 0)
-			release_lockinfo(old_li);
+			release_lockinfo(old_li->li_file->fi_ls, old_li);
 	}
 
 	remove_wait_queue(&li.li_waitq, &wq);
@@ -920,7 +923,7 @@ static int do_user_lock(struct file_info *fi, uint8_t cmd,
 	   unless we are adopting an orphaned persistent lock */
 	if (kparams->flags & DLM_LKF_CONVERT) {
 
-		li = get_lockinfo(kparams->lkid);
+		li = get_lockinfo(fi->fi_ls, kparams->lkid);
 
 		/* If this is a persistent lock we will have to create a
 		   lockinfo again */
@@ -938,7 +941,7 @@ static int do_user_lock(struct file_info *fi, uint8_t cmd,
 			   fail we want rid of it */
 			init_completion(&li->li_firstcomp);
 			set_bit(LI_FLAG_FIRSTLOCK, &li->li_flags);
-			add_lockinfo(li);
+			add_lockinfo(fi->fi_ls, li);
 
 			/* TODO: do a query to get the current state ?? */
 		}
@@ -1014,7 +1017,7 @@ static int do_user_lock(struct file_info *fi, uint8_t cmd,
 		list_add(&li->li_ownerqueue, &fi->fi_li_list);
 		set_bit(LI_FLAG_ONLIST, &li->li_flags);
 		spin_unlock(&fi->fi_li_lock);
-		if (add_lockinfo(li))
+		if (add_lockinfo(fi->fi_ls, li))
 			printk(KERN_WARNING "Add lockinfo failed\n");
 
 		complete(&li->li_firstcomp);
@@ -1025,7 +1028,7 @@ static int do_user_lock(struct file_info *fi, uint8_t cmd,
 
  out_err:
 	if (test_bit(LI_FLAG_FIRSTLOCK, &li->li_flags))
-		release_lockinfo(li);
+		release_lockinfo(fi->fi_ls, li);
 	return status;
 
 }
@@ -1037,7 +1040,7 @@ static int do_user_unlock(struct file_info *fi, uint8_t cmd,
 	int status;
 	int convert_cancel = 0;
 
-	li = get_lockinfo(kparams->lkid);
+	li = get_lockinfo(fi->fi_ls, kparams->lkid);
 	if (!li) {
 		li = allocate_lockinfo(fi, cmd, kparams);
 		if (!li)
@@ -1209,7 +1212,6 @@ static int __init dlm_device_init(void)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&user_ls_list);
 	mutex_init(&user_ls_lock);
-	rwlock_init(&lockinfo_lock);
 
 	ctl_device.name = "dlm-control";
 	ctl_device.fops = &_dlm_ctl_fops;