diff options
| author | Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> | 2010-02-15 10:50:42 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> | 2010-02-24 13:18:29 +0100 |
| commit | 0d670b24729be268eba98b3920b8571f60798d8d (patch) | |
| tree | 10f35ab6ea332bb2f082c5ffaed60e6442d36508 /arch | |
| parent | 75ef7cdda2daa35be9e070ac8e5258759ac03d06 (diff) | |
| download | linux-3.10-0d670b24729be268eba98b3920b8571f60798d8d.tar.gz linux-3.10-0d670b24729be268eba98b3920b8571f60798d8d.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-0d670b24729be268eba98b3920b8571f60798d8d.zip | |
microblaze: Fix cache loop function for cache range
I create wrong asm code but none test shows that this part of code is wrong.
I am not convinces that were good idea to create asm optimized macros
for caches. The reason is that there is not optimization with previous code
that's why make sense to add old code and do some benchmarking which
functions are faster.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c | 27 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c index d9d63831cc2..2a56bccce4e 100644 --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c @@ -172,16 +172,15 @@ do { \ /* It is used only first parameter for OP - for wic, wdc */ #define CACHE_RANGE_LOOP_1(start, end, line_length, op) \ do { \ - int step = -line_length; \ - int count = end - start; \ - BUG_ON(count <= 0); \ + int volatile temp; \ + BUG_ON(end - start <= 0); \ \ - __asm__ __volatile__ (" 1: addk %0, %0, %1; \ - " #op " %0, r0; \ - bgtid %1, 1b; \ - addk %1, %1, %2; \ - " : : "r" (start), "r" (count), \ - "r" (step) : "memory"); \ + __asm__ __volatile__ (" 1: " #op " %1, r0; \ + cmpu %0, %1, %2; \ + bgtid %0, 1b; \ + addk %1, %1, %3; \ + " : : "r" (temp), "r" (start), "r" (end),\ + "r" (line_length) : "memory"); \ } while (0); static void __flush_icache_range_msr_irq(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) @@ -313,16 +312,6 @@ static void __invalidate_dcache_all_wb(void) pr_debug("%s\n", __func__); CACHE_ALL_LOOP2(cpuinfo.dcache_size, cpuinfo.dcache_line_length, wdc.clear) - -#if 0 - unsigned int i; - - pr_debug("%s\n", __func__); - - /* Just loop through cache size and invalidate it */ - for (i = 0; i < cpuinfo.dcache_size; i += cpuinfo.dcache_line_length) - __invalidate_dcache(0, i); -#endif } static void __invalidate_dcache_range_wb(unsigned long start, |