diff options
author | FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> | 2009-01-11 17:38:12 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> | 2009-03-12 12:57:56 -0500 |
commit | 6e7490c73d8cc48e7084ac976c8be7bbaf530acf (patch) | |
tree | 47f6235cca759d562f333542cc9dc4fb355aad5a | |
parent | d943aeebc5194f3c6a81fb139ba406040324e4f3 (diff) | |
download | linux-3.10-6e7490c73d8cc48e7084ac976c8be7bbaf530acf.tar.gz linux-3.10-6e7490c73d8cc48e7084ac976c8be7bbaf530acf.tar.bz2 linux-3.10-6e7490c73d8cc48e7084ac976c8be7bbaf530acf.zip |
[SCSI] libfc: fix compile warning
I got the following warnings on IA64:
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c: In function 'fc_lport_recv_flogi_req':
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c:788: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u64'
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c:792: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u64'
scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c: In function 'fc_rport_recv_plogi_req':
/home/fujita/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c:968: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u64'
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c index 2ae50a1188e..7ef44501ecc 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c @@ -762,10 +762,11 @@ static void fc_lport_recv_flogi_req(struct fc_seq *sp_in, remote_wwpn = get_unaligned_be64(&flp->fl_wwpn); if (remote_wwpn == lport->wwpn) { FC_DBG("FLOGI from port with same WWPN %llx " - "possible configuration error\n", remote_wwpn); + "possible configuration error\n", + (unsigned long long)remote_wwpn); goto out; } - FC_DBG("FLOGI from port WWPN %llx\n", remote_wwpn); + FC_DBG("FLOGI from port WWPN %llx\n", (unsigned long long)remote_wwpn); /* * XXX what is the right thing to do for FIDs? diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c index dae65133a83..0472bb73221 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_plogi_req(struct fc_rport *rport, switch (rdata->rp_state) { case RPORT_ST_INIT: FC_DEBUG_RPORT("incoming PLOGI from %6x wwpn %llx state INIT " - "- reject\n", sid, wwpn); + "- reject\n", sid, (unsigned long long)wwpn); reject = ELS_RJT_UNSUP; break; case RPORT_ST_PLOGI: |