summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2010-09-05 20:25:43 +0100
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2010-09-06 23:09:51 +0100
commit300387c0b57d75e5218e2881d6ad2720657a8bcf (patch)
treeb176b0a28513678b6f808737af42415824b96d8d
parent4f233eff6f32745f8894eb513bc59851213c7833 (diff)
downloadlinux-3.10-300387c0b57d75e5218e2881d6ad2720657a8bcf.tar.gz
linux-3.10-300387c0b57d75e5218e2881d6ad2720657a8bcf.tar.bz2
linux-3.10-300387c0b57d75e5218e2881d6ad2720657a8bcf.zip
drm/i915: Clear the vblank status bit before polling for the next vblank
The vblank status bit is a sticky bit that must be cleared with a write of '1' prior to polling for the next vblank. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> jbarnes: I'd still rather see a lock, but I think you're right that we don't generally wait in code that needs not to miss an interrupt. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 11a3394f5fe..3fc767bcbaa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -990,6 +990,22 @@ void intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
int pipestat_reg = (pipe == 0 ? PIPEASTAT : PIPEBSTAT);
+ /* Clear existing vblank status. Note this will clear any other
+ * sticky status fields as well.
+ *
+ * This races with i915_driver_irq_handler() with the result
+ * that either function could miss a vblank event. Here it is not
+ * fatal, as we will either wait upon the next vblank interrupt or
+ * timeout. Generally speaking intel_wait_for_vblank() is only
+ * called during modeset at which time the GPU should be idle and
+ * should *not* be performing page flips and thus not waiting on
+ * vblanks...
+ * Currently, the result of us stealing a vblank from the irq
+ * handler is that a single frame will be skipped during swapbuffers.
+ */
+ I915_WRITE(pipestat_reg,
+ I915_READ(pipestat_reg) | PIPE_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+
/* Wait for vblank interrupt bit to set */
if (wait_for((I915_READ(pipestat_reg) &
PIPE_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS),