From b4159fdc374a1e85d08f316be752bba19af2ad8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "jy910.yun" Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:08:46 +0900 Subject: additional correction regarding haptic deadlock cause : when subthread is waiting to system server, unexpectly thread died. then the system server cannot reply because the receiver already died. solution : before subthread died, it must check whether the sub thread was waiting or not. Change-Id: I5609d4ab7ffd7a1c765432b43ec8f5335e373c45 --- tizen/DEVICE/src/file.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/tizen/DEVICE/src/file.c b/tizen/DEVICE/src/file.c index e3d4341..4063166 100644 --- a/tizen/DEVICE/src/file.c +++ b/tizen/DEVICE/src/file.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ typedef struct { static pthread_t tid; static BUFFER gbuffer; +static int lock; static int _check_valid_haptic_format(HapticFile *file) { @@ -111,6 +112,12 @@ static int _cancel_thread(void) return 0; } + MODULE_LOG("lock state : %d", lock); + while (lock) { + usleep(100); + MODULE_LOG("already locked..."); + } + __haptic_predefine_action(gbuffer.handle, STOP, NULL); if ((ret = pthread_cancel(tid)) < 0) { @@ -170,7 +177,9 @@ static void* __play_cb(void *arg) for (k = 0; k < pbuffer->channels; ++k) { ch = pbuffer->ppbuffer[k][j]; if (ch != prev) { + lock = 1; __haptic_predefine_action(pbuffer->handle, LEVEL, ch); + lock = 0; prev = ch; } usleep(BITPERMS * 1000); -- cgit v1.2.3